Trump claims ‘pictures’ show ‘vandals’ cut a 350ft slit in the reflecting pool floor but declines to show evidence
In an entirely predictable development, when Donald Trump was just pressed by reporters to explain the flawed renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, he denied that the contractors he awarded the work to were to blame and instead insisted that “vandals” had used a knife or box-cutter to cut a 350ft “slit” in the newly applied sealant, which started peeling away from the floor and floating to the surface within days of its application.
“I can’t help it if somebody goes in with a knife and starts hacking it up,” the president said.
“They went in there with a knife”, Trump said, repeating a claim he first made on social media. “Five people are arrested and five people are under investigation right now,” the president added, despite the fact that the arrests that have been made appear to be of tourists or curious locals who dipped their hands into the water to collect floating bits of sealant as souvenirs of the failed renovation.
When he was asked, by Ed O’Keefe of CBS News, if he could provide any evidence that vandalism was to blame, Trump first suggested that the parks department could show reporters what he called the long gash in the sealant. Asked if there were photographs or video of vandals in the pool, Trump said “we also have pictures of it”, but said they would be revealed in court at a later date.
Trump then claimed that the growth of algae in the pool was also caused by unseen vandals. Attributing his claim to what “somebody said”, the president told reporters: “They put, somebody said, fertilizer in the water. If you put fertilizer in the water, you get algae. But somebody said they might’ve put fertilizer, they did something to create the algae.”
He went on to say that the water had now been “purified”, apparently a reference to the hydrogen peroxide workers were seen pouring into the pool last week, before at least one duckling was found dead in the water.
Key events
As he wishes Starmer farewell, Trump says he tried to warn him about the ‘windmills’
Asked on Monday about the resignation of Keir Starmer, the UK prime minister he has been critical of, Donald Trump revealed that his biggest regret is that the Labour leader failed to take his advice to rip out his nation’s off-shore wind turbines and instead drill for oil.
“I think he’s a lovely man, but I said, ‘You’re really messing up energy: you have windmills all over the place, in the meantime you have the North Sea oil and they won’t let anybody drill’, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Monday, hours after Starmer bowed to the inevitable and stepped down to make way for a more charismatic rival, Andy Burnham.
The 2024 Labour manifesto Starmer’s government was elected to enact did indeed pledge “to double onshore wind, triple solar power, and quadruple offshore wind by 2030” and “not issue new licences to explore new fields” in the North Sea, “because they will not take a penny off bills, cannot make us energy secure, and will only accelerate the worsening climate crisis”.
As the BBC explained last year, Trump’s obsessive hatred for wind turbines, which he calls, mistakenly, windmills, began with his quixotic battle to stop the installation of 11 turbines off the coast of an Aberdeenshire golf course he owns.
In 2015, a week after Trump infamously called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States” at a campaign event, five justices at Britain’s highest court rejected his attempt to prevent the offshore windfarm being built within sight of his golf course.
A decade later, the turbines were visible to reporters who followed Trump to Scotland when, as president, he held a promotional event for a new course at his resort, dedicated to himself.
Trump, or a ghostwriter, tries to explain ‘Team Algae’ protesters at reflecting pool
On his social media platform, Donald Trump, or a ghostwriter with a better sense of grammar, punctuation and history, has criticized “Team Algae”, a handful of left-wing activists who staged an absurdist protest against him over the weekend in Washington DC, by appearing at the edge of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool to cheer for the algae his $14m renovation failed to clear.
The president, or an aide, posted an image of one of the protesters, a woman in an inflatable pink frog costume holding up a banner that read: “First they came for the algae”. The post then noted that the reference in the phrase on the banner is to a famous passage from a speech made by Martin Niemöller, a German Lutheran pastor, in 1946, to lament that he had not spoken up against the Nazis before it was too late.
The post on Trump’s account first suggests that the pro-algae protester is “likely paid”, repeating a familiar claim for which he has presented no evidence, and then notes:
The sign says, “First they came for the algae…” which is in reference to a famous post-WW2 statement about Germans not speaking out against the Nazis:
“…Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”
While the slogan on the banner clearly is a reference to Niemöller’s famous lament, and Trump, or his ghostwriter, might intend to suggest that the protester is making light of the Holocaust, they seem not to realize that invoking Niemöller, who was a political prisoner from from 1937 to 1945, is clearly a way to equate Trump to the Nazis.
The president’s annotation of the Niemöller reference also leaves out the fact that the first part of the text, which came from remarks in multiple speeches the former prisoner made during a lecture tour of Allied-occupied Germany in 1946, refers not to the rounding up of Germany’s Jews, but of its communists or socialists.
Chris Stein
The Senate on Monday passed a bipartisan measure aimed at lowering housing costs by streamlining construction and permitting, ending months of fraught negotiations on a priority for both parties ahead of November’s midterm elections.
The 21st Century Road to Housing Act would limit investors’ ability to buy homes, waives some federal permitting rules in an effort to ease new construction, and authorizes pilot programs to facilitate grants for home improvements and planning affordable housing. It passed the Senate overwhelmingly, with a vote of 85-5, and now heads to the House of Representatives.
The legislation comes as Democrats and Republicans prepare for November’s midterm elections, in which concerns about affordability are expected to loom large in the minds of the voters who will decide control of Congress for the final two years of Donald Trump’s term.
A shortfall in construction of new homes is seen as a key driver of housing costs, which have crept higher in recent years. Last year, House and Senate lawmakers began working on legislation that could draw the bipartisan support needed to pass, but wound up producing competing bills, creating an unusual standoff between the chambers.
The version the Senate approved on Monday combines aspects of both chambers’ bills, and includes language banning investors from buying single family homes if they already own 350 or more properties, which Trump has sought to crack down on. There are also provisions to expand access to manufactured homes, and increase mortgage availability.
Woman detained by a dozen federal officers for picking a piece of floating debris from Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool
To bolster his claim that “vandals”, not shoddy work by his hand-picked contractors, are responsible for chunks of newly applied sealant floating on the surface of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, Donald Trump pointed to a handful of arrests that have been made at the site.
Video from the water’s edge, however, shows that people are being arrested for much more innocuous behavior.
One incident on Monday, caught on video by Charlie Cotton of TMZ DC, showed a young woman dipping her hand into the pool to retrieve what looked like a small shard of the failed lining, only to be stopped by a man in a National Park Service T-shirt, who then placed her in the custody of two national guards troops.
Before she was eventually handed what looked like a citation by a police officer, the video shows that the woman was detained by a dozen men, including more national guard soldiers, US park police officers and at least one US Marshal.
At one stage, two of the guardsmen appeared to laugh with the woman over her arrest.
Later on Monday, the same video journalist also spoke to a man being led away in handcuffs from the pool area by US Park Police officers. The man said that he had been arrested for “yelling at Oklahoma state troopers.”
Asked why he was yelling at them, the man replied, “Because they’re here.” The federal takeover of policing in Washington DC is broadly resented in the city.
When the journalist asked why he would yell at the Oklahoma officers for policing the capital, the man laughed and said, “Lick the boot. If you love the boot, lick it.”
As two oil tankers cross strait of Hormuz, Trump falsely claims record oil flow
Donald Trump, who is fond of claiming to have set records that either do not exist, or he is nowhere near matching, told reporters on Monday that, as a result of the ceasefire in the war he started with Iran, the strait of Hormuz “is totally open” and “we took in more oil yesterday than we’ve ever, than has ever gone through the strait”.
That is not close to true.
Before the US-Israeli attack on Iran started on 28 February, about 50 large oil tankers crossed the strait each day, according to video collected by the ship-tracking company Starboard Maritime Intelligence.
Two crude tankers with just under 2m barrels of oil sailed through the strait of Hormuz on Monday, ship tracking data showed, and two supertankers, which can carry a maximum of 4 million barrels of crude, sailed into the Gulf through the strait, Reuters reports. One of the ships was bound for the Iraqi port of Basra.
Trump claims ‘pictures’ show ‘vandals’ cut a 350ft slit in the reflecting pool floor but declines to show evidence
In an entirely predictable development, when Donald Trump was just pressed by reporters to explain the flawed renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, he denied that the contractors he awarded the work to were to blame and instead insisted that “vandals” had used a knife or box-cutter to cut a 350ft “slit” in the newly applied sealant, which started peeling away from the floor and floating to the surface within days of its application.
“I can’t help it if somebody goes in with a knife and starts hacking it up,” the president said.
“They went in there with a knife”, Trump said, repeating a claim he first made on social media. “Five people are arrested and five people are under investigation right now,” the president added, despite the fact that the arrests that have been made appear to be of tourists or curious locals who dipped their hands into the water to collect floating bits of sealant as souvenirs of the failed renovation.
When he was asked, by Ed O’Keefe of CBS News, if he could provide any evidence that vandalism was to blame, Trump first suggested that the parks department could show reporters what he called the long gash in the sealant. Asked if there were photographs or video of vandals in the pool, Trump said “we also have pictures of it”, but said they would be revealed in court at a later date.
Trump then claimed that the growth of algae in the pool was also caused by unseen vandals. Attributing his claim to what “somebody said”, the president told reporters: “They put, somebody said, fertilizer in the water. If you put fertilizer in the water, you get algae. But somebody said they might’ve put fertilizer, they did something to create the algae.”
He went on to say that the water had now been “purified”, apparently a reference to the hydrogen peroxide workers were seen pouring into the pool last week, before at least one duckling was found dead in the water.
As he described the two executive orders he was about to sign in the Oval Office on Monday, Donald Trump seemed to reveal that he had no idea what at least one was about.
Reading from a binder on his desk, Trump said: “The second order I’m signing directs federal agencies to transition to what is called quantum … cryptography.”
The president paused before mispronouncing the word cryptography as “crypto-graphy”. He then looked up at reporters assembled in the room and asked: “Does anybody know what that is?”
Trump signs executive orders on quantum technology, gripes about not winning Nobel prize
At the start of an Oval Office event to sign two executive orders on quantum technology, Donald Trump just welcomed some of the officials and experts standing behind his desk.
When Trump introduced “Nobel prize-winning quantum physicist John Martinis”, he looked to his right at the silver-haired physicist and said: “Great going. Should you tell them how many years ago it was?”
Martinis, who won the Nobel in 2025, joked that it was “about 40 years ago”.
Trump, apparently not in on the joke, told the physicist who is in his late 60s, “and you still look good”.
The subject of the Nobel having been raised, the president, who recently started two armed conflicts, took the opportunity to return to his grievance about not having been awarded a Nobel peace prize. “I’ve been waiting for one of them too. They don’t think eight wars in enough,” referring to his invented claim to have settled that many armed conflicts. “Even though nobody’s even done one,” he griped, inaccurately.
Despite an adverse court ruling, the US Department of Justice is refusing to back off its claim that Minnesota’s governor, Tim Walz, attorney general, Keith Ellison, and the Minneapolis mayor, Jacob Frey, should all be investigated for breaking the law by refusing to cooperate with federal immigration raids in the state that led to the killing of two peaceful protesters, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, by federal officers.
Earlier on Monday, the US district court for Minnesota unsealed an order from Chief Judge Patrick Schiltz rejecting subpoenas for the elected Democrats as politically motivated.
Schiltz, a former Republican Senate staffer who clerked for supreme court justice Antonin Scalia before being nominated to the federal bench by George W Bush, wrote that initiating an investigation “in order to ‘harass political opponents or to coerce them into taking official action – particularly official action that the federal government cannot directly require those political opponents to take – is a blatantly unlawful and unethical use the grand-jury process”.
Despite this stinging rebuke from a conservative jurist, a spokesperson for the Department of Justice insisted in a statement to the Guardian that it was simply investigating unlawful behavior.
“The Department takes the unlawful obstruction of federal law enforcement operations extremely seriously and will continue to act in full compliance with the law to investigate these matters”, the spokesperson said.
Rachel Leingang
Here’s a more in-depth report on a federal judge blocking the justice department’s attempt to subpoena Minnesota’s governor, Tim Walz, attorney general, Keith Ellison, and the Minneapolis mayor, Jacob Frey, from our Minneapolis-based Midwest political correspondent, Rachel Leingang.
A federal judge agreed to quash the US federal government’s subpoenas of leaders in Minnesota issued during the Trump administration’s controversial immigration crackdown on the state earlier this year.
The US Department of Justice issued subpoenas to the Minnesota governor, Tim Walz, the attorney general, Keith Ellison, the Minneapolis mayor, Jacob Frey, and other local officials in the Twin Cities in January.
The department said it was investigating the officials for obstructing federal immigration enforcement. Local and state officials largely did not support the federal enforcement surge, during which federal agents killed two US citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, in the streets.
The US district court for Minnesota unsealed an order from Chief Judge Patrick J Schiltz on Monday that showed the subpoenas were rejected as politically motivated. Ellison posted the unsealed order on Monday, saying the decision to quash the subpoenas was an “extremely rare step” by the court.
In the order, Schiltz wrote that the Trump administration had been “threatening and attempting to punish states and localities that have adopted ‘sanctuary’ policies”. He noted that initiating an investigation “in order to ‘harass political opponents or to coerce them into taking official action – particularly official action that the federal government cannot directly require those political opponents to take – is a blatantly unlawful and unethical use the grand-jury process”.
Read Rachel’s full report here:
Trump’s effort to subvert mail-in voting suffers another setback in Maryland
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Maryland election officials do not have to comply with a demand from the Trump administration to turn over the state’s complete list of registered voters, dealing another legal setback to Donald Trump’s plan to subvert mail-in voting by asserting federal control.
In her opinion, US district judge Stephanie Agli Gallagher, who was nominated to the court by Trump in 2019, rejected the Department of Justice’s claim that the Civil Rights Act of 1960 required states to turn over complete voter rolls as “absurd”.
The Democratic election and voting rights attorney Marc Elias celebrated the decision in his Democracy Docket newsletter, writing:
Donald Trump desperately wants to build a national database of voters. His plan is to have his administration control who stays on the list and who gets removed. He has issued unconstitutional executive orders to accomplish this goal, and the U.S. Postal Service has proposed a new rule to do his bidding.
The problem for Trump is that his Department of Justice keeps losing cases that it needs to access this critical data. This humiliating string of defeats threatens to derail Trump’s signature plan to subvert the 2026 midterm elections.
This morning, a federal judge in Maryland handed the DOJ its ninth defeat in a series of 31 cases the department has filed to gain access to state voter files. The DOJ has yet to win a single one. The court wrote that it “joins every court to have addressed this issue in concluding that [a state voter file] is not a record or paper that a state must produce to the United States.”
Importantly, of the nine cases the DOJ has lost, five were decided by judges nominated by Trump.
As the Guardian reported in May, the US Postal Service could throw the upcoming midterm elections into chaos by requiring states to provide lists of voters who received mail ballots, according to a draft rule.
Nearly one in three Americans voted by mail in 2024, but Trump, who wants to restrict the number of voters by limiting ballots cast by mail, signed an executive order in March that prohibits the USPS from delivering ballots to any voters not on a federal list of citizens deemed eligible to vote in each state by the Department of Homeland Security.
The USPS proposal to implement this order seeks to require states to give the postal service the names and barcodes tied to mail-in ballots for federal elections. The public will have until 2 July to comment on the proposed rule before the Trump administration can finalize it.
Vance says he did not feel snubbed by Iran’s foreign minister during viral moment before talks
Before boarding his flight home from Switzerland, the US vice-president JD Vance spoke to reporters on the tarmac and was asked if he felt snubbed by Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, when Iran’s top negotiator came into the same room as him but did not greet the American.
“No,” Vance said. “I’ve spent a lot of time dealing with the Iranians over the last few months. Sometimes I find them extremely confusing as negotiators.
“What I did find kind of funny is that after that initial meeting, there was this, you know, sort of social media firestorm where everybody said the Iranians are going to leave, and then we proceeded to talk to them for like the next nine hours,” Vance added. “So I would just encourage the media, mistrust a little bit what you see coming out of Iranian social media. They could be confusing negotiators, but we feel like we’re making progress.”
Video of Iran’s foreign minister leaving the room without acknowledging Vance was indeed viewed millions of times on social media.
The vice-president also said: “We continue to make progress on these technical negotiations. We left a lot of our team, the Iranians left a lot of their team at the resort there to keep on working at it.”
Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey said the investigation was “never about justice, law, and order, but the absence of it”.
“Subpoenaing political opponents because they spoke on behalf of their constituents violates the core tenets of our democracy and human decency,” he said, according to AP reports.
Frey also observed that criticizing government action is not a crime. “One of the defining strengths of our democracy is the ability to challenge those in power without fear of retribution. Elected officials have both the right and the responsibility to speak honestly about how government decisions affect the people they serve,” he said.
Keith Ellison, the Minnesota attorney general, said “it should disturb every American that Donald Trump is weaponizing the criminal justice system against people he disagrees with”.
Kaohly Her, St Paul mayor, said the subpoenas were “a politically motivated retaliation against our city for lawfully standing up to ICE and fighting for our residents”.
Walz says case is example of DoJ going after Trump’s political opponents
The subpoenas were first issued in January amid a violent immigration crackdown in Minnesota that led to the killings of Minneapolis residents Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good.
As well as Tim Walz, the Trump administration issued subpoenas for Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey, the offices of the state attorney general, Keith Ellison, the Hennepin county attorney, Mary Moriarty, the St Paul mayor, Kaohly Her, and the Ramsey county attorney, John Choi.
On Monday, Walz – who was Kamala Harris’s running mate in the 2024 election – issued a statement after the ruling, saying: “The US justice department is pursuing criminal investigations into the president’s political opponents. This case was just one example of that, but we are seeing daily reminders of this administration’s lawlessness — in Minnesota and around the country. We all must continue to seek justice and uphold the rule of law.”
Here’s more from the AP on the federal judge’s ruling:
The ruling is the latest rebuke by the federal judiciary of Justice Department efforts to aggressively implement the Trump administration agenda in courts and target the president’s political adversaries through subpoenas and similar demands.
The judge ruled that there appeared to be “extremely weak to nonexistent” connections between the information sought in the subpoenas and any possible criminal violation. The subpoenas seek materials “that largely if not entirely relate to constitutionally protected conduct,” the judge wrote, noting that Minnesota has the legal right not to devote its resources to enforcing federal immigration law.
The Justice Department “is not conducting a criminal investigation,” the judge wrote, “but is instead using the grand jury process for other (unlawful) purposes.”
The evidence that the subpoenas were issued for unlawful reasons is overwhelming, the judge said, arguing that the Justice Department “has struggled — without success — to identify a single plausible investigatory justification” for them.
The DoJ has yet to comment on the ruling.
Federal judge blocks effort to subpoena Minnesota governor Tim Walz and officials
A federal judge has blocked efforts to subpoena Tim Walz and other Minnesota officials, calling it an attempt to “harass and retaliate against them”, the AP reports.
US district judge Patrick Schlitz ruled that the main purpose of the subpoenas – part of a Trump administration investigation into alleged obstruction of deadly ICE raids in the state earlier this year – was to “coerce Minnesota officials into assisting the federal government with enforcing civil immigration law and to harass and retaliate against them for failing to do so.”
Minnesota governor Walz said the ruling was “a victory for the rule of law and our democracy”.
Donald Trump said Iran will agree to have weapons inspections in future to ensure what he called “nuclear honesty”.
The president’s Truth Social post on Monday echoed comments made by his vice-president, JD Vance, who said Tehran had agreed to allow nuclear inspectors back into the country “as soon as today”.
Trump said: “Everybody is fully aware that Iran will agree to have Major Weapons Inspections in order to ensure “Nuclear Honesty” long into the future.”
